#Hearts of iron 4 artillery upgrade

I changed that by giving all four artillery вЂ¦ Support arty helps, but you want that line arty, because Japan doesn't start with artillery. Lowering width to 2 would be complete overkill.The first tech that gives you an actual missile is basically what the V-2 was: a crude, proto-ballistic missile. Would add you can also easily refit SPG from older tanks.ДЄs it is I would say it is balanced well and both options are viable. Even encirclement tank unit want get rid off attacking units halting their progtress as fast as possible.ДЄrgument about production is good reading as well. +you utilize soft attack during defense as well. Still keeping them in my templates both early and late game. It goes goes bit down further by technology tree.Д«reakthorugh is generally your defense while attacking so it is in case of tank unit against hard attack that is quite low early + you usually benefit from armor bonus.Д«ut as time goes, enemy piercing and hard attack increase, ratio between tanks and SPG decrease, resulting SPG lose a bit value later. So close to be twice as strong in soft attack. Soft attack of 34 model is almost 4x better for spg than for tank!ДЈx tank (6width] = 3x16 = 48 soft attack.

#Hearts of iron 4 artillery upgrade

The difference in soft attack is actually huge and can not be esilly get (plus you upgrade your tanks anyway so you talk about only that 1 extra)ДЄnd it is more early. It just seems like every way you mix them into a template, the entire template suffers across the board for a very tiny gain in soft attack which could be better mitigatied from maxing out the gun on the main tank type and using support artillery as sp art which has a similar org impact. Have industries big enough to support decent sized armies consisting of SPG's, TDВґs and motorized with a few dedicated breakthrough divisions of tanks. A lot of medium sized countries (hungary, romania, Poland etc.). Originally posted by Scharny:Depends on what country you are. The gain from producing SPGs and TDs over Tanks makes most sense for Light and heavy tanks series. (IC Cost per Battalion) / (Factory output) = Time to builtДЎ Battalion of Light Tank II: 540 IC / 67,5 = 8 DaysДЎ Battalion of L-SPG II: 324 IC / 67,5 = 4,8 days (5 days)ДЎ Battalion of L-TD II 270 IC / 67,5 = 4 daysДЎ Battalion of Medium Tank I: 600 IC / 67,5 = 8,88 days (9 days)ДЎ Battalion of M-SPG I: 432 IC / 67,5 = 6,4 days (7 days)ДЎ Battalion of M-TD I: 288 IC / 67,5 = 4,266 days (5 days)ДЎ Battalion of Heavy Tank I: 1000 IC / 67,5 = 14,81 days (15 days)ДЎ Battalion of H-SPG I: 600 IC / 67,5 = 8,88 days (9 days)ДЎ Battalion of H-TD I: 500 IC / 67,5 = 7,41 days (8 days) (Base Factory output) X (Amount of factories) = Factory Output per day Time for 15 military factories to built 1 battalion:

(Amount of Units) X (Cost per unit) = Industrial costДЎ Battalion of Light Tank II: 60 units X 9 = 540 ICДЎ Battalion of L-SPG II: 36 units X 9 = 324 ICДЎ Battalion of L-TD II 30 units X 9 = 270 ICДЎ Battalion of Medium Tank I: 50 units X 12 = 600 ICДЎ Battalion of M-SPG I: 36 units X 12 (cost per unit) = 432 ICДЎ Battalion of M-TD I: 24 units X 12 (cost per unit) = 288 ICДЎ Battalion of Heavy Tank I: 40 X 25 = 1000 IC The same is true for TDВґs, they are also cheeper to built a battalion of.Д®specially in MP this is a very efficent way to built a defensive army capable of dealing both with PURE soft damage armies and most breakthrough divisions. There are fewer SPG's in a single battalion in a division compared with a single battalion of tanks. Tanks are more expensive to built a division of.